- - -
The meeting convened at 1:17 p.m.-
- - -
OPTIONAL SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITIES
Ms. Wong presented Educational Services Communication No. 2 recommending the approval of the student performance indicators selected by the District's options schools participating in California's Alternative Schools Accountability Model.
Ms. Wong and Mr. Crittendon responded to questions raised by the Committee. At the request of the Committee, staff will meet with the Committee members to provide additional information on this issue.
The communication will be presented as a direct report to the Board of Education on September 25, 2001.
EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION GRANT
Ms. Schroeder presented Early Childhood Education Division Communication No. 1 proposing to accept funds and amend its 2001-02 child development general program contract with the California Department of Education to reflect additional operational funding for expansion of early education centers for children 0 to 5 years old. The budget will reflect an increase of $1.8 million plus $491,566 representing a 3.87% cost-of-living adjustment for 2001-02 and $12.7 million the following year.
Ms. Schroeder, Dr. Ott, and Mr. Lancaster responded to questions raised by the Committee.
The communication was approved for transmittal to the Board of Education on September 11, 2001.
STANDARDS-BASED PROMOTION
Mr. Tokofsky presented his motion on Standards-Based Promotion.
In response to a question raised by Mr. Tokofsky, Ms. Shannon replied that the data on Intensive Academic Support (IAS) was premature because today was the opening day of school for single-track schools. Until the child actually arrives at the school and enrolls in the class, he or she is not entered as an IAS second grader.
At the request of Mr. Tokofsky, the motion will not be acted upon until the Committee reviews the IAS data and Stanford 9 reading scores at its November meeting.
INSTITUTE FOR LEARNING
Ms. Patti Magruder, representing the National Fellow, reported that the Institute for Learning was established six years ago by Dr. Lauren B. Resnick. It is based at the University of Pittsburgh at the Learning Research and Development Center.
Ms. Magruder stated that the goal of the Institute for Learning is to ensure that every child achieves the standards that have been adopted by the District. She spoke about the guidelines for organizing teaching and learning environments to create effort-based schools and the guidelines for establishing curriculum and pedagogy that will ensure achievement of rigorous academic standards by all students.
Superintendent Romer, Dr. Ott, and Ms. Magruder responded to questions raised by the Committee.
ELEMENTARY LITERACY PLAN
Ms. Ephraim reported that in 1999, the Board of Education adopted the District Literacy Plan calling for all schools to teach language arts for a minimum of 90 minutes in kindergarten and 2 1/2 hours minimum in grades 1 through 5. In June, the first year of the five-year plan was completed.
Ms. Ephraim reported that there are 388 schools using Open Court (83% of the elementary schools); 26 schools (6% of the schools) are using Success for All; one school uses Reading Mastery; and 52 high achieving and charter schools (11% of the schools) are presently on waiver from the District Reading Program and using methods that were in place in their schools prior to September 1999. Each of these schools is required to submit a waiver request to their local District Superintendent outlining steps that they take to address the needs of underachieving students in their school. In June 2002, the State Board of Education will adopt Standards-Based Language Arts materials for grades K through 8. These schools will then be required to adopt a Standards-Based text.
Ms. Ephraim spoke about professional development, literacy coaches, closing the achievement gap, Open Court Reading/English Language Arts Standards, data collection plan, kindergarten end-of-year assessment, end-of-year fluency, and the focus of the reading program.
Ms. Ephraim, Mr. Konantz, and Ms. Shannon responded to questions raised by the Committee.
Speaker
Ms. Lorena Jaramillo, a member of the community, expressed her concern that her daughter does not have a science textbook.
Notes by: Dinah Edwards, Board Secretariat
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District REVISED