BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District

SPECIAL AUGMENTED FACILITIES COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES
1:00 p.m., Thursday, November 29, 2001 - Board Room (H-160)


Board Members Present
:
Mr. Mike Lansing, Chairperson
Mr. José Huizar
Ms. Julie Korenstein
Ms. Caprice Young

Proposition BB Blue Ribbon Citizens Oversight Committee Member Present:
Mr. Scott Folsom

Staff Present:
Mr. James A. McConnell, Jr., Chief Facilities Executive
Mr. Dave Jensen, Environmental Health and Safety Branch
Mr. Secundino Garcia, Program Analyst, Independent Analysis Unit

- - - -
The meeting convened at 1:15 p.m.
- - - -

REMARKS

Mr. McConnell announced that:


Mr. Lansing stated that the mitigated negative declarations would be considered first and then the approval of projects would be considered. The Committee will hear the presentations first for mitigated negative declarations and then take speakers before hearing questions from the Committee.

APPROVAL OF MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

Mr. Jensen presented on Angelo Bellomo's behalf. Mr. Jensen clarified that Central Los Angeles New High School No. 9, East Valley New Middle School No. 2 and Orthopaedic Hospital Medical Magnet High School are Environmental Impact Reports. North Hollywood New Elementary School No. 3 is a Mitigated Negative Declaration.

Mr. Jensen summarized each project. He added that he believes the North Hollywood site will receive a final check after demolition to make sure there is no impact from any lead based paint on the property.


Ms. Rosemary Mora spoke in favor of the East Valley New Middle School No. 2 Project. She also brought in a petition of 42 signatures representative of those in the community who also wish to see this project succeed.

Mr. Pedro Lopez, Ms. Ofelia Montes, Mr. Felipe Garcia, and Mr. Jesus Aragon spoke in favor of the North Hollywood New Elementary School No. 3 Project.

Mr. Juan C. Marquez, a tenant, spoke in favor of North Hollywood New Elementary School No. 3 Project but stressed that there needed to be some sort of solution for displacees. Mr. McConnell asked Mr. Alberto Tovar, Special Projects Director, Real Estate Branch, to speak with the gentleman about relocation services available.

Ms. Esther Portillo, a tenant organizer for the Coalition for Economic Survival, expressed concern over a lack of communication regarding relocation services and not receiving adequate access to relocation information and outreach meeting notices. Ms. Portillo was also concerned that there was no plan to rebuild affordable replacement housing for displacees in her community. She would also like to receive an update of the North Hollywood project's budget. Mr. McConnell asked
Ms. Beth McCarthy to set up a meeting time with Ms. Portillo, the community, and the Relocation and Outreach staff so that these concerns can be addressed.

Ms. Alma Quintero spoke about tenant's concerns connected to the North Hollywood New Elementary School No. 3 project.

Ms. Blanca Zaragoza handed out a letter addressing concerns connected to the North Hollywood New Elementary School No. 3 project.

Ms. Maritza de Artan, representing the Immaculate Heart Community Blythe Street Project in Panorama City, spoke in favor of the East Valley New Middle School No. 2 Project. She congratulated the Outreach team for making this project well known to people in her community and for being available and addressing the community's concerns.

APPROVAL OF PROJECT

Mr. Lansing began discussion by asking whether or not Central Los Angeles New High School No. 9 would be open to local residents and whether or not this school was a magnet school.
Mr. Ivan Kesian, Project Manager, replied that this is a comprehensive high school and would only serve the local residents.

Mr. Huizar asked if this project was fully funded and whether or not lighting was included in this project. Mr. Kesian said it was fully funded and that lighting was not included. Mr. Huizar asked Mr. Kesian to get an estimate to include field lighting and to identify a funding source before the Board votes on this project.

The Committee instructed staff to include field lighting as a matter of policy in all project budgets.

Mr. Huizar asked if the Orthopaedic project was fully funded. Mr. Bassam Rasian, Project Manager, and Mr. McConnell replied that this project was not fully funded and will be funded through future state or local bonds. This project did not meet the deadline for funding because of the environmental RAW required on the site.

Mr. Folsom suggested that these reports include a traditional two-semester seat count and year round seat count.

These reports were approved to go forward to the Board for action on December 11, 2001.

- - - -
The meeting adjourned at 2:05 p.m.
- - - -












































BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Governing Board of the Los Angeles Unified School District

Special Augmented Facilities Committee
Thursday, November 29, 2001
1:00 p.m., Room H-160 (Board Room)

Facilities Committee Members Committee Contact Person
Mike Lansing, Chairperson James A. McConnell, Jr.
Genethia Hudley Hayes, Member Facilities Services Division
José Huizar, Member (213) 633-7203
Ms. Caprice Young, Member
Robert Garcia, Ex Officio Member
Timothy Buresh, Ex Officio Member
Ellen Oppenheim, Ex Officio Member


PRESENTATION
AND DISCUSSION

PRESENTATION TIME PRESENTOR

1. Remarks 3 minutes Jim McConnell

2. Approval of Mitigated Negative Declaration for: 15 minutes Angelo Bellomo
(Grand Avenue and Cesar Chavez, The Hill)
Avenue and Roscoe Boulevard, The Drive-In)
School (Grand Avenue Between 23rd Street and
Adams Boulevard)
(Tujunga Avenue, Lankershim Boulevard,
Califa Street, and Tiara Street)

3. Approval of Project: 15 minutes Kathi Littmann

Avenue and Roscoe Boulevard, The Drive-In)
School (Grand Avenue Between 23rd Street and
Adams Boulevard)
(Tujunga Avenue, Lankershim Boulevard,
Califa Street, and Tiara Street)






Augmented Facilities Committee
Thursday, November 29, 2001
Page 2




4. Items Referred to the Facilities Committee by the Board of Education or Committee of the Whole¨

The Facilities Committee may consider and act upon motions, Board Reports, or other business referred to it by the Board of Education or Committee of the Whole, with respect to any properly posted matter at a meeting immediately preceding this committee meeting, where the time between that meeting and this committee meeting is less than 72 hours. Members of the public are encouraged to review the order of business or agenda for the meetings of the Board of Education or Committee of the Whole.

5. Public Comments

Persons who wish to address the committee may sign up at the committee meeting.