BOARD OF EDUCATION OF
THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Governing Board of the
Los Angeles Unified School District
SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
333 South Beaudry
Avenue, Board Room
1:30 p.m. Thursday,
September 30, 2004
The Board of Education of the City of Los
Angeles, acting as the Governing Board of the
Los Angeles Unified
School District, met in special session on September 30, 2004, at the
Administrative Offices, 333 South Beaudry Avenue, Board Room.
Vice President Marlene
Canter called the meeting to order at 1:39 p.m.
The following Members
were present: Ms. Julie
Korenstein, Ms. Marguerite Poindexter LaMotte, Mr. Jon Lauritzen, Mr. David
Tokofsky and Vice President Marlene Canter were present.
Mr. Mike Lansing arrived
at 1:45 p.m. Mr. JosŽ Huizar was
absent.
Mr. Lauritzen led the
Pledge of Allegiance.
Superintendent Roy Romer
was present.
Superintendent Romer
highlighted some of the current events going on in the District and discussed
the following elements of Small Learning Communities:
¥ the process by which decisions will be made;
¥ the way to delegate appropriate
autonomy with accountability; and
¥ the creation of a Òcommunity of
interestÓ with parent and teacher involvement.
Dr. Lilliam Castillo,
Executive Officer to the Superintendent, and Kathy Rattay, Director,
Educational Options, Academy and Career Development Branch, commented on the
grants provided by the Federal government through the State Department of
Education. Ms. Rattay introduced
Mr. Michael Butler from Public Works who presented the findings of his
evaluation of small schools and small learning communities in the
District. He indicated the
evaluation uses the 2002-03 as the baseline year.
In response to Board
Members questions, Mr. Richard Sheehan, Special Counsel to the Board, clarified
that speakers must be heard before voting on the board report or the
motion. The Board gave an option
to the speakers to speak at this meeting or when the items are before the Board
for action.
- - - -
Vice President Canter modified the Order of Business.
- - - -
BOARD MEMBER MOTION
DRAFT
Ms. LaMotteÕs motion
regarding Adherence to the Promotional Examination Process was assigned to the
Human Resources Committee:
Resolved, That
the Los Angeles Unified School District implement and utilize a merit based
promotional examination system for all certificated promotional administrative
classifications with five or more positions, and who are members of the
Associated Administrators of Los Angeles;
Resolved
further,That any circumvention of this motion by means of Administrative
Regulations 4213 and 4214 receive approval by the majority of the Board of
Education of the City of Los Angeles;
Resolved further,
That the Board directs the Superintendent to bring back within 60 days a
proposal for an examination process, which would include:
¥ An assessment center
¥ Confidential tracers
¥ A ranked list
incorporating a rule of five
¥ A process by which
qualified candidates on an existing list would be integrated into newly
established lists; and be it finally
Resolved,
That if this proposal is not acceptable, the Superintendent must submit a
proposal to the Board to eliminate all promotional examinations and allow local
and general superintendents to make all administrative assignments.
Ms. LaMotteÕs motion
regarding Promotion and Transfer of Principals and Teachers was assigned to the
Human Resources Committee:
Whereas, There has been
no policy directing the promotion and transfer of principals and teachers from
low performing schools (API 1-3) to central district positions after school has
officially opened at the beginning of the school year;
Whereas, One of the
goals of this District is to eliminate the achievement gap;
Whereas, Removing
teachers and principals for promotions once school has begun disrupts the
teaching-learning process for the school and adversely affects the academic
performance and achievement level of the school;
Whereas, Long-range
planning is imperative in effectively operating our schools; and
Whereas, If a waiver is
granted, the assigned principal will not leave the school until a permanent
principal has been assigned; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That
assignments, which require the transfer of a principal or teacher, must be made
prior to the opening of school to minimize disruption to the schoolÕs learning
environment; and be it
Resolved further,
That this motion may be waived only after an exhaustive search has been
done for personnel whose
transfer would not negatively impact the instructional or operational
environment of the school. Waivers
must be approved by the local district and general superintendents and a school-community
meeting hosted by the local district must be called to communicate the proposed
change.
- - - -
Vice President Canter resumed the Order of Business.
- - - -
The following speakers
addressed the Board on small learning communities:
Mr. Doug Waybright representing the
Senior High PrincipalsÕ Organization
Mr. Steve Jubb representing Bay Area
Coalition for Equitable Schools
Mr. Steve Bachrach
Mr. Jim Patterson
Mr. John Fernandez
Ms. Linda Guthrie representing United
Teachers Los Angeles
Ms. Laurie Fidler
Mr. Mathew Taylor
Mr. Manuel Aldana
Ms. Lisa Milton
Mr. Alvaro Bueno
Ms. Lorena Jaramillo
Mr. Tony Jackson
Superintendent Romer
briefly discussed the budgetary impact and other matters regarding small
learning communities. He mentioned
that some aspects of the policy need to be negotiated with the bargaining
agencies and responded to questions from Board Members.
- - - -
The meeting recessed at 3:31 p.m. to reconvene at 1:00 p.m., on
October 5, 2004.
- - - -
The Board reconvened the
recessed meeting of September 30, 2004, at 1:34 p.m. The following Board Members were present: Ms. Korenstein, Mr. Lansing, Mr.
Lauritzen, Mr. Tokofsky, and Vice President Canter. Ms. LaMotte arrived at 1:35 p.m. Mr. Huizar was absent.
The following speakers
addressed the Board:
Ms. Linda Guthrie, in place of Dr.
Mike OÕSullivan, representing United Teachers Los Angeles
Mr. Dan Isaacs representing Associated
Administrators of Los Angeles
Superintendent Romer
commented that for the last four years staff has been working on this issue as
demonstrated by the grants from the Federal government with great involvement
by principals, teachers, and others.
This policy will structure the DistrictÕs continued efforts in small
school reform.
Every proposal will
start at the school level and will come for approval to a Central District
Committee, where each proposal will be evaluated for recommendation to the
Board.
Ms. Sylvia Rousseau, Mr.
Robert Collins, Ms. Rowena Lagrosa, Dr. Dale Vigil, Local District
Superintendents, made brief presentations to the Board.
Superintendent Romer
urged the Board to adopt both the policy and the motion.
Ms. Rousseau, Dr.
Castillo, Ms. Lagrosa, Mr. James Delker, Deputy Chief Executive for Existing
Facilities, and Superintendent Romer responded to concerns expressed by Board
Members.
After discussion, Mr.
Lansing moved a motion to call the question to end discussion. Ms. Korenstein seconded the motion,
which on roll call was adopted 6 ayes.
Mr. Huizar was absent.
REGULAR CALENDAR
Board of Education Revised Report No. 63 - 04/05
Small Learning Communities
Ms. Korenstein moved
that the report be adopted. Mr.
Lauritzen seconded the motion, which on roll call was adopted 5 ayes, 1 no, Mr.
Tokofsky. Mr. Huizar was absent.
BOARD MEMBER MOTION (Continued)
ACTION
Ms. Korenstein moved the
following motion regarding Small Learning Communities:
Resolved, That
no General Fund Money be used for
Small Learning Communities in Fiscal Year 2004-2005.
Whereas, The Board of
Education of the City of Los Angeles is committed to increasing the numbers of
students who graduate from high school and ensuring equal access to
post-secondary opportunities;
Whereas, Educational
research and experience demonstrate that students do better academically when
they feel a connection with their schools, and small schools are a hopeful
avenue for the improvement of urban public education;
Whereas, Small Learning
Communities should have a distinct and compelling vision, mission, goals and
objectives as well as identity that is clearly recognizable hence creating a
spirit of collaboration among stakeholders;
Whereas, Small Learning
Communities, generally ranging from 300-600 350-500 students,
provide a personalized learning environment where every student is well known
by a group of educators;
Whereas, Small Learning
Communities have an inclusive admission policy reflective of the diverse
student population and should mirror that of the former large comprehensive
high school;
Whereas, Teacher
learning and planning time are an integral part of Small Learning Communities;
therefore, Small Learning Communities develop their own professional
development component that will honor all District initiatives, while focusing
on the needs of the students within a particular Small Learning Community;
Whereas, Small Learning
Communities provide coherent, rigorous standards-based curriculum and
culturally linguistically responsive pedagogy that provide a continuous
educational experience across a range of grades;
Whereas, Students will
be expected to demonstrate mastery of the California State standards in order
to graduate; and
Whereas, Small Learning
Communities seek out community partners, whose identities help to shape and
support the educational process inside and outside the school; now, therefore,
be it
Resolved, That
the Superintendent and his staff provide timely and regular feedback on the
progress of the implementation and receipt of grant awards and report by
October 1 on all past federal, state, and private grants for Small Learning
Communities as well as provide their evaluations and proposals;
Resolved further,
That the Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles instructs the
Superintendent of Schools and his staff to redirect appropriate existing
resources and seek additional outside funding in the form of grants to support
planning, design, professional development, and implementation activities for
Small School Learning Communities;
Resolved further,
That each Small Learning Community will may develop an assessment
schedule as well as monitoring system for evaluating student progress and
informing instruction in addition to state and District mandated instruction
and assessments;
Resolved further,
That Small Learning CommunitiesÕ curriculum will may be developed
by the Small Learning Community group and be fully aligned to state and
District standards; and be it finally
Resolved, That
the Small Learning Communities will be approved for a maximum of five years by
the local schoolÕs governance structure model and may be submitted on appeal to
the Central Small Learning Communities committee or local superintendent and alternatively
or on second appeal to the Board of Education upon recommendation by the
local school site council, the Local District Superintendent, and the Central
Small Learning Communities Committee, for approval by the Superintendent with
appeal to the Board of Education.
If a disposition is not made within ninety (90) days, it may be brought
directly to the Board of Education.
Mr. Lauritzen seconded
the motion, which on roll call was adopted 6 ayes. Mr. Huizar was absent.
DRAFT
Ms. Canter, Mr. Tokofsky
- Targeted Instructional Improvement Grant Funding
Whereas, The Los Angeles
Unified School District conversion charter schools serve District students;
Whereas, Funding for
Targeted Instructional Improvement Grant (TIIG) is the court-ordered
desegregation and voluntary integration program funding; and
Whereas, TIIG funding
reduces the harm of racial isolation and meets court orders still in force in
conversion charter schools; now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That
the Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles directs the Superintendent to
restore all TIIG resources previously allocated to conversion charter schools
for fiscal year 2004-2005; and be it
Resolved, That
the Board directs the Superintendent to conduct a full review to determine
whether TIIG funding should continue to be allocated to conversion charter
schools beyond fiscal year 2004-2005.
Ms. Modesta Bassity,
Coordinator of Student Integration Services, and Mr. Mark Shrager, Deputy
Budget Director, made a brief presentation regarding the discontinuance of
resources for 7 conversion charter schools totalling approximately $2.2 million
and the calculation of TIIG funding.
Ms. Bassity and Dr. Ott
responded to questions from Board Members.
On motion by Mr.
Lauritzen, seconded by Ms. LaMotte, the meeting adjourned by general consent at
3:48 p.m. Mr. Huizar, Mr.
Lansing, and Mr. Tokofsky were absent.
APPROVED BY THE
BOARD: November 23, 2004
_________________________________ ___________________________________
MARLENE
CANTER JEFFERSON
CRAIN
VICE PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE
OFFICER OF THE BOARD