President Genethia Hudley Hayes called the meeting to order at 2:22 p.m.

The following Members were present: Ms. Victoria M. Castro, Ms. Valerie Fields, Ms. Julie Korenstein, Mr. Mike Lansing, and President Genethia Hudley Hayes. Mr. David Tokofsky arrived at 2:27 p.m. and Ms. Caprice Young arrived at 2:26 p.m.

Student Members Jane Lee from Granada Hills High School, Shani Sabban from Grant High School and Susana Parras from Kennedy High School were present.

Superintendent Roy Romer was present.

Student Member Jane Lee led the Pledge of Allegiance.

Student Member Shani Sabban commented on her school's diverse multicultural community, how the student government works with students to solve their differences by holding a Multicultural Fair and a Gratitude Day in which students show gratitude toward each other, teachers, and administrators. One of the areas of concern at her school is how to improve Stanford 9 test scores. She also noted the overcrowded conditions of the Advancement Placement classes.

Student Member Susana Parras addressed the overcrowding in math, English and history classes and the lack of 9th and 10th grade college and career planning counselors. She also noted that Kennedy High School is a digital high school and every classroom is wired with a computer and connected to the internet and there is a multi-media lab in the library. She thanked Ms. Korenstein for helping the school receive money from FEMA for the new gymnasium, replacement of the tennis court and a new baseball field

BOARD OF EDUCATION REPORT NO. 1

Ms. Fields seconded the motion, which by general consent was adopted. Ms. Castro, Ms. Korenstein and Ms. Young were absent.

Later in the meeting Ms. Castro and Ms. Korenstein recorded aye votes on the report.

Ms. Young moved that the report be adopted. Ms. Fields seconded the motion, which by general consent was adopted. Ms. Castro and Ms. Korenstein were absent.

Later in the meeting, Ms. Castro and Ms. Korenstein recorded aye votes on the report.

Later in the meeting, Ms. Castro and Ms. Korenstein recorded aye votes on the report.

Later in the meeting, Ms. Castro and Ms. Korenstein recorded aye votes on the report.

Later in the meeting, Ms. Castro and Ms. Korenstein recorded aye votes on the report.

Later in the meeting, Ms. Castro and Ms. Korenstein recorded aye votes on the report.

Ms. Castro abstained from voting on Agreement Nos. 0100722, 0100724, and 0100726 in Section (1) of Board of Education Report No. 8 for reasons previously stated in the Minutes of February 20, 1996, and voted aye on the balance of the report.

Mr. Tokofsky abstained from voting on Agreement Nos. 0000595 in Section (1) of Board of Education Report No. 8 for reasons previously recorded in the Minutes, Regular Meeting, January 8, 1996, and voted aye on the balance of the report.

Ms. Fields voted no on Agreement No. 100581 and aye on the balance of the report.
Ms. Castro and Ms. Korenstein were absent.

Later in the meeting, Ms. Castro and Ms. Korenstein recorded aye votes on the report.

Later in the meeting, Ms. Castro and Ms. Korenstein recorded aye votes on the report.

Later in the meeting, Ms. Castro and Ms. Korenstein recorded aye votes on the report.

Later in the meeting, Ms. Castro and Ms. Korenstein recorded aye votes on the report.

Later in the meeting Ms. Castro and Ms. Korenstein recorded aye votes on the report.

Later in the meeting, Ms. Castro and Ms. Korenstein recorded aye votes on the report.

Later in the meeting, Ms. Castro and Ms. Korenstein recorded aye votes on the report.

Resolved, That the Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles amend the existing social promotion policy at the very least to:

2.retain any eighth grader whose reading score is below 5 or who has been below 10 three

The following speakers addressed the Board on Ms. Korenstein's motion regarding Indoor Air Quality and Respiratory Health in Schools (Noticed November 14, 2000) which was assigned to School Safety and Campus Environment Committee:

Ms. Johanna Goldberg

Mr. Kenneth Ballard representing 10th District PTA

Ms. Korenstein moved:

Whereas, Every child has a right to a safe and healthy learning environment, and the maintenance of this environment is essential to learning and a goal of the Los Angeles Unified School District;

Whereas, Indoor air pollution is a recognized public health risk affecting everyone, with children the most vulnerable, and indoor air pollution exacerbates asthma and other respiratory health problems, and asthma is the leading cause of school absence due to a chronic health condition;

Whereas, Indoor air quality (IAQ) programs in schools can substantially reduce the level of indoor air pollution and enhance the health and educational performance of children;

Whereas, The District encourages increased environmental health awareness in schools, and has initiated training and mentor programs, participated in Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) studies, and has partnered with the U.S. EPA and the American Lung Association of Los Angeles County in the implementation of the "IAQ Tools for Schools" program, which provides guidance to prevent potential IAQ problems and resolve them should they occur;

Whereas, The District encourages increased asthma awareness and management in schools, and has also partnered with the American Lung Association of Los Angeles County in the implementation of "Open Airways for Schools", which is a nationally recognized program for asthma prevention, consisting of student and parent education and staff development; and

Whereas, The District believes that agencies and organizations, both public and private, should work to ensure strict compliance with health-based air quality standards, including the mitigation of external sources of air pollution in proximity to schools and other District facilities; now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles recognizes the value of the "IAQ Tools for Schools" and "Open Airways for Schools" Programs, recommends the further implementation of these programs, and supports the District's active participation in other programs dedicated to achieving a "best practices" approach toward providing a healthy learning and working school environment; and be it

Resolved further, That the Board of Education should distribute this resolution to school administrators, staff, parents, health professionals, regulatory agencies, and other members of the school community, as evidence of the District's commitment to the above referenced programs and its ongoing efforts to ensure a safe learning environment for students and staff throughout the District; and be it finally

Resolved That an advisory committee be established to recommend strategies for the effective implementation of the aforementioned programs, and that the Board of Education receive an annual progress report prepared by the Environmental Health and Safety Branch.º

Mr. Tokofsky moved a waiver of Board Rule 72 to allow action to consider the following motion regarding the El Salvador Earthquake Relief. Ms. Castro seconded the motion, which by general consent was adopted.

The following speakers addressed the Board on the motion:

Mr. Poland Palencia

Mr. Marvin Andrade

Ms. Leticia Mendez

Ms. Korenstein moved:

Whereas, An earthquake measuring 7.6 on the Richter scale struck El Salvador on the morning of Saturday, January 13, 2001, killing hundreds, injuring thousands, and destroying millions of dollars worth of property throughout the country;

Whereas, The Los Angeles Unified School District has a tradition of assisting those who have suffered the effects of natural disasters, e.g. Hurricane Mitch in Honduras in 1998 and the earthquake in Kobe, Japan, in 1995; and

Whereas, Los Angeles is home to the largest community of Salvadorans outside of El Salvador; now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles authorize a campaign to collect funds to assist the people of El Salvador as they deal with the devastating effects of the earthquake; and be it

Resolved further, That this Board direct the Superintendent to assign appropriate staff and resources to organize and begin the fundraising drive immediately; and that the Superintendent identify the appropriate agency in El Salvador to disburse the funds in a responsible and effective manner.º

Ms. Patricia McPherson representing Grassroots Coalition

Ms. Lorena Jaramillo

Dr. David Sanchez

Later in the meeting the following speakers addressed the Board on the report.

Ms. Maria Rodriguez

Ms. Lupe Fernandez

Mr. George Buzzetti

Mr. Gene Krischer representing Friends of the Children

Mr. David Koff

Mr. Dafer Dakhil

Mr. Michael Saulenas

Ms. Gloria Soto

Ms. Castro moved to reconsider the Board's decision on December 12, 2000 in its Closed Session meeting. Ms. Young seconded the motion, which by general consent was adopted.

Mr. Lansing moved:

A. Introduction

It is time to make a decision on the Belmont Learning Complex (BLC) property. It is imperative that any plan to move forward should include a range of options and involve the private sector.

It is proposed that we go to the private sector, through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process, and request proposals for specific solutions with specific costs as described in the following three options:

Option 1:Remediation to specific standards and completion of the BLC project for use as a school, with appropriate indemnification.

Bidders would specify a remediation and/or risk mitigation solution that would meet health and safety standards as identified by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC).

Exhibit A provides an example of the types of standards that DTSC would be expected to issue for this site. Bidders would specify the cost of this remediation and provide a guaranteed maximum price to meet the safety standards required.

Bidders would also specify the means and cost of ongoing monitoring of the remediation system at the site and provide a guaranteed maximum price for the monitoring system. Finally, bidders would need to address protection for the District against ongoing liability through indemnification, insurance or other means. Bidders will be invited to submit proposals for utilizing all or part of the site.

standards as provided in Option 1, with a provision to lease back the completed complex either to the District or a charter school organization for use as a school.

As with Option 1, bidders would need to specify their remediation solution and costs, as well as ongoing monitoring and costs. In addition, they would need to address the purchase price, lease terms and transfer of liability.

Bidders would need to specify purchase price, terms, and timing. They would also need to address the issue of long-term liability.

Steps required to initiate this process:

• Staff will begin discussions with the DTSC to review the details of the plan, including the specific health and safety standards for corrective action at the property.

• Simultaneously, staff will begin the development of an RFP document encompassing all the requirements for bidders. It is anticipated that the RFP could be issued as early as February 1, 2001.

• Bidders would be given 90 days to develop and submit their proposals.

• After submission, a technical review committee appointed by the Superintendent will screen the proposals. To be considered, proposals must be responsive, meet the established standards, and demonstrate that the firm or firms proposing have the wherewithal to deliver.

• If all milestones are met during this process, the Board would be in a position to consider the Superintendent's recommendations in mid to late June 2001.

1. Contaminants in soil and shallow groundwater shall be subject to cleanup or removal to those levels which will not expose school occupants to a significant health risk. For purposes of this standard, "significant health risk" is defined as either an excess cancer risk of 1.0 x 10—6, or a hazard index (HI) greater than 1.0.

2. All enclosed buildings shall be protected by a gas barrier system which will prevent the infiltration of methane and other subsurface gases. Gases collected by the barrier shall be safely vented around the perimeter of the buildings and discharged in a manner which will not create a significant health risk to school occupants or members of the adjoining community.

3. Mitigation measures shall be applied to all subsurface vaults, piping, conduits and other enclosed structures, sufficient to ensure against the infiltration and accumulation of gases in amounts which could cause or contribute to an explosion.

4. Gas migration barriers or alternative engineering controls shall be employed in outdoor areas to ensure that the concentration of hydrogen sulfide and other toxic gases of subsurface origin do not expose school occupants to a significant health risk.

5. An operations and maintenance plan (OMP) shall be developed and implemented to ensure that the remedial systems referenced above will operate without failure throughout the projected 70-year life of the school. Implementation of the OMP shall be the responsibility of an independent agent approved by the Board of Education.

6. All proposed cleanup and mitigation measures shall be permitted or approved by the State Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD), City Fire Department and other applicable regulatory agencies.

7. After all remedial work at the site is completed, certification shall be made by the DTSC that the approved remedial actions, other mitigation measures, and the OMP have been successfully implemented, and that the site is safe for occupancy.

Ms. Castro seconded the motion.

Ms. Fields moved the following amendment:

A. Introduction

It is time to make a decision on the Belmont Learning Complex (BLC) property. It is imperative that any plan to move forward should include a range of options and involve the private sector.

It is proposed that we go to the private sector, through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process., and request proposals for specific solutions with specific costs as descried in the following three options:

Option 1:Remediation to specific standards and completion of the BLC project for use as a school, with appropriate indemnification.

Bidders would specify a remediation and/or risk mitigation solution that would meet health and safety standards as identified by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC).

Exhibit A (see page 9) provides an example of the types of standards that DTSC would be expected to issue for this site. Bidders would specify the cost of this remediation and provide a guaranteed maximum price to meet the safety standards required.

Bidders would also specify the means and cost of ongoing monitoring of the remediation system at the site and provide a guaranteed maximum price for the monitoring system. Finally, bidders would need to address protection for the

District against ongoing liability through indemnification, insurance or other

means. Bidders will be invited to submit proposals for utilizing all or part of the site.

As with Option 1, bidders would need to specify their remediation solution and costs, as well as ongoing monitoring and costs. In addition, they would need to address the purchase price, lease terms and transfer of liability.

Bidders would need to specify purchase price, terms, and timing. They would also need to address the issue of long-term liability.

Steps required to initiate this process:

• Staff will begin discussions with the DTSC to review the details of the plan, including the specific health and safety standards for corrective action at the property.

• Simultaneously, Sstaff will begin the development of an RFP document encompassing all the requirements for bidders. It is anticipated that the RFP could be issued as early as February 1, 2001.

• Bidders would be given 90 days to develop and submit their proposals.

• After submission, a technical review committee appointed by the Superintendent will screen the proposals. To be considered, proposals must be responsive, meet the established standards, and demonstrate that the firm or firms proposing have the wherewithal to deliver.

• If all milestones are met during this process, the Board would be in a position to consider the Superintendent's recommendations in mid to late June 2001.

7. After all remedial work at the site is completed, certification shall be made by the DTSC that the approved remedial actions, other mitigation measures, and the OMP have been successfully implemented, and that the site is safe for occupancy.

Ms. Korenstein seconded the motion, which on roll call failed 4 noes, 3 ayes, Ms. Fields, Ms. Korenstein and Mr. Tokofsky.

Mr. Tokofsky moved to amend the motion requesting that the Request for Proposal (RFP) be approved by the Board at its February 13, 2001 regular meeting. Ms. Korenstein seconded the motion, which on roll call failed 5 noes, 2 ayes, Ms. Korenstein and Mr. Tokofsky.

Mr. Tokofsky moved to amend the motion by deleting under Item A - Introduction, "It is time to make a decision on the Belmont Learning Complex (BLC) property." Ms. Fields seconded the motion.

Staff agreed to the change and the motion was withdrawn.

On roll call the motion as amended was adopted, 4 ayes, 3 noes, Ms. Fields, Ms. Korenstein, and
Mr. Tokofsky.

The final motion reads:

A. Introduction

It is imperative that any plan to move forward should include a range of options and involve the private sector.

B. The Proposed Process

It is proposed that we go to the private sector, through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process, and request proposals for specific solutions with specific costs as described in the following three options:

Option 1:Remediation to specific standards and completion of the BLC project for use as a school, with appropriate indemnification.

Bidders would specify a remediation and/or risk mitigation solution that would meet health and safety standards as identified by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC).

Exhibit A provides an example of the types of standards that DTSC would be expected to issue for this site. Bidders would specify the cost of this remediation and provide a guaranteed maximum price to meet the safety standards required.

Bidders would also specify the means and cost of ongoing monitoring of the remediation system at the site and provide a guaranteed maximum price for the monitoring system. Finally, bidders would need to address protection for the District against ongoing liability through indemnification, insurance or other means. Bidders will be invited to submit proposals for utilizing all or part of the site.

standards as provided in Option 1, with a provision to lease back the completed complex either to the District or a charter school organization for use as a school.

As with Option 1, bidders would need to specify their remediation solution and costs, as well as ongoing monitoring and costs. In addition, they would need to address the purchase price, lease terms and transfer of liability.

Bidders would need to specify purchase price, terms, and timing. They would also need to address the issue of long-term liability.

Steps required to initiate this process:

• Staff will begin discussions with the DTSC to review the details of the plan, including the specific health and safety standards for corrective action at the property.

• Simultaneously, staff will begin the development of an RFP document encompassing all the requirements for bidders. It is anticipated that the RFP could be issued as early as February 1, 2001.

• Bidders would be given 90 days to develop and submit their proposals.

• After submission, a technical review committee appointed by the Superintendent will screen the proposals. To be considered, proposals must be responsive, meet the established standards, and demonstrate that the firm or firms proposing have the wherewithal to deliver.

• If all milestones are met during this process, the Board would be in a position to consider the Superintendent's recommendations in mid to late June 2001.

1. Contaminants in soil and shallow groundwater shall be subject to cleanup or removal to those levels which will not expose school occupants to a significant health risk. For purposes of this standard, "significant health risk" is defined as either an excess cancer risk of 1.0 x 10—6, or a hazard index (HI) greater than 1.0.

2. All enclosed buildings shall be protected by a gas barrier system which will prevent the infiltration of methane and other subsurface gases. Gases collected by the barrier shall be safely vented around the perimeter of the buildings and discharged in a manner which will not create a significant health risk to school occupants or members of the adjoining community.

3. Mitigation measures shall be applied to all subsurface vaults, piping, conduits and other enclosed structures, sufficient to ensure against the infiltration and accumulation of gases in amounts which could cause or contribute to an explosion.

4. Gas migration barriers or alternative engineering controls shall be employed in outdoor areas to ensure that the concentration of hydrogen sulfide and other toxic gases of subsurface origin do not expose school occupants to a significant health risk.

5. An operations and maintenance plan (OMP) shall be developed and implemented to ensure that the remedial systems referenced above will operate without failure throughout the projected 70-year life of the school. Implementation of the OMP shall be the responsibility of an independent agent approved by the Board of Education.

6. All proposed cleanup and mitigation measures shall be permitted or approved by the State Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), and by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD), City Fire Department and other applicable regulatory agencies.

7. After all remedial work at the site is completed, certification shall be made by the DTSC that the approved remedial actions, other mitigation measures, and the OMP have been successfully implemented, and that the site is safe for occupancy.

On roll call was adopted by a vote of 4 ayes, 3 noes, Ms. Fields, Ms. Korenstein and Mr. Tokofsky.

Office of the Superintendent No. 2 - Chanda Smith Consent Decree "Coordinated Implementation
Plan for Students with Disabilities No. 15: Section 504": Assigned to Regular Calendar,
February 27, 2001

Office of the Superintendent No. 3 - Chanda Smith Consent Decree "Coordinated Implementation Plan for Students with Disabilities No. 16: Transition from School to Adult Living": Assigned to Regular Calendar February 27, 2001

Business Services Division No. 1 - Ratification of Agreements and Amendments, Agreements for Professional Services Aggregating over $250,000, Amendments to Agreements for Professional Services, and Donation: Assigned to Regular Calendar

Facilities Services Division No. 1 - Award of Advertised, Unadvertised, and Informal Contracts, Rejection of Bids, and Ratification of Agreement with Tree People: Assigned to Regular Calendar

Human Resources No. 1 - Special Education Credential Waiver Authorizations: Assigned to Consent Calendar

Human Resources No. 2 - Approval of Nonroutine Personnel Actions: Dismissal of Classified Employee: Assigned to Consent Calendar

Educational Services No. 2 - Resolution to Participate in Partnership Grant Applications Between Visual and Performing Arts Unit and Various Los Angeles Nonprofit Arts Education Providers: Assigned to Consent Calendar

Educational Services No. 3 - Resolution to Participate in Partnership Grant Applications Between Visual and Performing Arts Unit and the California Youth Theatre, Inc., the Light Bringer Project and/or Hollywood Entertainment Museum: Assigned to Consent Calendar

Facilities Services Division No. 2 - Authorization to Pay California Science Center the Relocation Cost Balance (Manual Arts New Elementary School No. 1): Assigned to Regular Calendar

1:30 p.m., Special Meeting, January 4, 2001
9:30 a.m., Closed Session, January 9, 2001
9:30 a.m., Closed Session, January 16, 2001

Ms. Korenstein seconded the motion, which by general consent was adopted. Ms. Castro, Mr. Lansing and Ms. Young were absent.

Whereas, The safety of the students and staff of the Los Angeles Unified School District is of paramount importance;

Whereas, Every student has the right to a safe and clean learning environment in good repair;

Whereas, It is the responsibility of every District employee to ensure the safety of our students;

Whereas, All schools should be maintained according to a uniform standard;

Whereas, Parents need to be assured that their child is attending school in a safe environment;

Whereas, The daily use of District facilities can result in wear or damage that can create a hazard to students and staff;

Whereas, The proceeds of Proposition BB have enabled the District to perform much needed repairs, and increase maintenance and operations funds; and

Resolved, The District shall establish a program to conduct annual cleanliness and safety evaluations at each campus; and be it

Resolved further, That Maintenance and Operations, the Environmental Health and Safety Branch, and the Local District Facilities Directors shall work cooperatively to develop a uniform inspection checklist for this purpose and cost analysis. The program developed shall be presented to the Board for review no later than March 31, 2001.º

There will be Special Committee of the Whole meetings on Tuesday, January 30, at 10 a.m., regarding the Facilities Master Plan and the Environmental Mitigation Process, and on Thursday, February 1, at 10 a.m., regarding the District Reorganization Update in the Board Room, H-160.

Ms. Mary Shatynski Campus Christmas Observance

Mr. Neal Geisler representing the PSA Issue
Association of PSA Counselors

Mr. Richard Arthur representing LULAC Children's Education

Ms. Diane Coley Ethics

Ms. Jan Irvin Youth Services

Mr. Julio Reyes School Safety

Ms. Stephanie Haynes Administrator's Misconduct

Ms. Wanda Solomon Parents Rights

Ms. Jan Murdock Psychologists Unresolved Issues

Mr. Rick Selan Reform

Ms. Shirley Isaacson Psychologists Unresolved Issues

APPROVED BY BOARD: February 13, 2001

_____________________________________ ____________________________________
GENETHIA HUDLEY HAYES JEFFERSON CRAIN
PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE BOARD

nf